Practice in automation
Where AI helps: anomaly detection, test assistance and quality assurance.
Foundations and context for industrial practice
We use AI to create technical specifications, support programming logic (as far as Siemens software allows), produce manuals and operating guides, and build test environments for our programs. Integration into live plants, especially for anomaly detection, is in preparation.
Artificial intelligence follows one basic principle: a model is trained with very large volumes of data and learns to recognize patterns and predict probabilities. Different inputs create different models:
All models share the same workflow: an input arrives (text, image, audio). An invisible instruction, often called the system prompt, sets the role or context. The neural network processes the data, detects patterns and calculates probabilities. The output is a human-readable result – text, image, speech, music or analysis.
The takeaway: AI does not think; it calculates the most likely fit. The same principle powers systems that write text, design images, understand speech, generate audio or analyze videos.
Beyond training data, the system prompt is central. It is the invisible start command that tells the AI which role or behavior to adopt.
The same language model can produce very different results depending on the prompt. One sentence changes dramatically by role:
def sunset():
return "The sun sets in the evening."
So the prompt steers the output even though the underlying model is the same. In practice, the right prompt lets an AI answer factually, creatively, legally, technically or entertainingly – whichever perspective is needed.
You are an experienced automation engineer.
Your job is to write technical documentation clearly,
with a structured outline and in line with standards.
Use precise terminology, a consistent structure
and a factual tone.
For useful answers, an AI must “see” what is being discussed. The current conversation or text does not fit into the model without limits; instead there is a context window – the working area that holds the latest sentences, paragraphs or pages.
Everything inside this window can be used directly. Information that falls outside or has already been pushed out is no longer visible. The model does not remember like a human; it only processes what is currently in the window.
If a question arrives without matching context, the AI may still answer by falling back on patterns from training data. This is where hallucinations arise: outputs that sound plausible but are factually wrong or invented.
For users this means: the better you control context – e.g., via precise input or additional documents – the more reliable the answer becomes.
Strictly speaking an AI has no awareness. It computes probabilities and recognizes patterns but knows nothing in the human sense. Still, there are ways to extend its usable knowledge and capabilities:
In short: you cannot expand an AI’s consciousness, but you can extend its knowledge context and skills via external retrieval, light adapters or additional training.
Short answer: no, not in the foreseeable future.
A PLC performs tasks that differ fundamentally from what an AI model can do. A controller is deterministic, runs its cycles precisely in milliseconds and always delivers the same result. That reliability is crucial when industrial processes must run predictably.
Controllers are also bound to strict norms and safety requirements. Industrial systems must be provably safe, validatable and certifiable. An AI model is probabilistic: it calculates likelihoods and can vary its output with context. That is valuable for analysis but does not meet the demands of a safety-critical real-time system.
Robustness differs as well. Controllers are built to run for decades under harsh conditions. Large AI models run on powerful hardware and need regular updates and maintenance.
That does not mean AI has no place in automation. It can complement controllers for anomaly detection or predictive maintenance to spot deviations early. It can optimize energy use or dynamically adjust production plans. It can also support engineers and technicians by drafting function blocks or triaging error messages quickly.
Bottom line: a PLC is a safety-critical real-time system. An AI model is a powerful pattern recognizer and optimizer. They are not interchangeable but can work effectively together.
The answer depends on how AI is deployed. Three common setups:
So safety is driven less by the technology itself and more by the operating model. From cloud chatbots through hybrid API setups to fully offline operation, there are tiers to match your privacy and infrastructure requirements.
An agent extends a language model so it can act, not just answer. While an LLM mainly understands and generates text, an agent adds action logic and tools.
This enables automation beyond text generation. An agent can gather information from different sources, plan intermediate steps, prepare results and then execute an action. In automation practice, agents can monitor systems, analyze data or assist engineers with automatic suggestions and documentation.
So an agent is not a new model, but the surrounding structure that embeds a model into concrete workflows and takes over practical, repeatable tasks.
Where AI helps: anomaly detection, test assistance and quality assurance.
Deterministic control vs probabilistic models: requirements for safety, validation and auditability.
Typical architectures: data connections, edge inference, monitoring, protocols and lifecycle of the models.
Want to explore concrete use cases or evaluate a solution? Talk to us.